A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning possible neighbours more than the construction of a wall at a coastal site within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated national consideration next an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family residence at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of planning breaches, environmental considerations, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Situations post about René Collier along with the Irish Periods short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has progressed into a highly publicised legal fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than building will work at the site on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a corporation director respectively, search for to make their family members household. The case is now emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, exactly where development pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of proven people. Based on the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting created by their future neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted beneath planning permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally citizens of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their preparing permission by building a wall beyond the boundaries of their web-site, bringing about an encroachment on a Distinctive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result parts are subject matter to rigid controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have lasting ecological consequences, particularly in the sensitive coastal environment for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, which can be partly designed, is in the proper place. Their legal crew has characterised the motion being an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their perspective, an allegation that's been repeated in court docket and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal scheduling disputes, the place sights of the sea are both highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts because of the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, As outlined by sworn proof referenced from the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded via waistline-large water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, a picture that has since come to be emblematic on the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Collect Visible evidence with the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how the two Adult men entered the water through serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become one of the most hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely noted that these steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was staying encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately by the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as audience sought to understand the background and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders should be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant in the legal timeline.
At the Main with the dispute is usually a disagreement around boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage the wall, as created, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has long been called meticulous in his evaluation of preparing files, maps, and ailments connected for the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those pressured that their action is enthusiastic by worry for environmental safety and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public see, insisting instead that it's about ensuring that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have described their lengthy-standing relationship to the realm as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a couple only attempting to establish a household home in accordance Along with the law. They deny that the wall encroaches over a Special Location of Conservation and say that every one operates have already been carried out depending on Qualified advice and authorized strategies. Their legal professionals have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering the sea in the course of a storm, will not alter the fundamental info.
The case has also raised broader questions on how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute over design of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as increasingly common. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental concerns, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from quite various Experienced backgrounds can find them selves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of waistline-high drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods and René Collier waded through waist-significant h2o throughout a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily fact of your coastline and also the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme technique.
As being the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom have to ascertain if the wall as designed complies with setting up authorization and no matter if any encroachment right into a Specific Location of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and scheduling disorders. Still the human factor remains central: neighbours who should Are living along with each other extensive following the legal prices are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design will work at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case extend further than that tackle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the significance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential troubles such as environmental defense and property legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a spot of purely natural splendor and contested boundaries. The Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 wall at the centre on the dispute stands partly built, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Regardless of whether it will eventually in the end be altered, taken out, or done as planned will rely on the courtroom’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to Just about the most carefully viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin recently.